Blog page | Review Blog | Politalks        RSS Feed Subscribe to this blog

Lee GriffinAbout Lee: Former students' union president and intermitent blogger since the turn of the century, who's aim is to promote objective thinking and a break from partisan politics when discussing the issues of the day. Contact him.

The Redruth curfew - a truly illiberal act

Tue 15th Jul 2008 – (11 Comments)

You'd think we're in some kind of war time disaster scenario, or the pinicle of crime in our time, the way some seem to wish to go on about "youths" and the crime they cause. Of course, by crime we mean nuisence. And by nuisence we mean they look a little bit unruly while standing around causing no harm whatsoever to anyone. In Redruth they wish now to ramp up from dispersal orders which have clearly had no lasting effect by implementing a curfew scheme, something the Times claims has wide ranging support not only for Cornwall but nationally as well!

How Cornwall, completely ruled over by Liberal Democrats, can abide by this I'll never know. But I'll say this, if you wanted one shining example of why I could never be an active Lib Dem supporter then Cornwall is your answer. Try as we might, the Cornish are a fairly liberal sort...those not living there in their second or third home pushing those actually from the region away that is...it seems our endeavours to encourage liberal governance is being thrown back in our face at every turn.

While we must not demonise all young people, we have to acknowledge that youngsters don't have to commit crime or anti-social behaviour to be intimidating to residents. - Julia Goldsworthy

I don't know why Julia doesn't just switch parties to the Conservatives already and be done with it. How the hell can you end up not demonising all children while simultaneously applying a blanket law depriving them of their freedoms and treating them as criminals after an arbitrary time? As if suddenly after 9pm they all turn in to feral beasts that go to town on the local communities. And that is even aside from the arbitrary ages applied also, as if those that have turned 16 are suddenly respectable chaps and chapesses. She goes on to say...

Simply hanging around on street corners can be enough of a threat.

This is how out of touch Julia has become in such a short time. Lock the kids up because some withering fools are threatened by them standing around! No, no, don't go to the fuddy-duddies and try to alleviate their concerns, something like "here's a number you should call if they do anything illegal" or, "stop moaning you paranoid time waster", simply get straight to the source and cut the rights down of the youth. I mean, after all, the young can't vote can they?

In fact all of this looks like it's the Lib Dem's turn to try and follow the Tories on every level from the (absolutely bizarre) council all the way to it's MPs. Not content with having had them steal the show with their "lock 'em up" routine, as David Cameron would have it, now the Lib Dem's want to be seen tough on an issue that is also entirely pointless. I mean...did they not realise it would be illegal to actually enforce?

Of course they did, which is why this scheme is "voluntary", if you can call threatening parents with control orders if they don't ensure their kids are under their roof by 9pm a "voluntary" measure. To me it sounds like giving people the choice between cutting their arm off themselves voluntarily or having the state do it for them anyway.

You only have to look back three years, to Richmond, to see that the police will have a hard time telling any kids to go anywhere without being told, not so politely no doubt, to fuck off.

So it's a scheme that potentially breaches the human rights act, follows the path of other orders that have been deemed illegal, and also should you read in to it only actually makes any impact in a small area, a particular part of Redruth not all of it. One of two things here are going to happen, either the kids are all going to go and loiter in areas they didn't before, increasing the unease that sheltered middle-aged folk have as the unwashed masses come closer to their front garden, or the police are going to crack down on all children on the basis of the actions of those in one area.

I suppose that latter example wouldn't be the surprising course of action given that the curfew is, by its very nature, an act of penalising all children because of the minority. Think this is just someone on a blog talking nonsense?

think the curfew is a great idea to clamp-down on the handful of youngsters who cause problems in Close Hill. It is just a handful of children in the area who cause problems and not the majority. - Mark Kaczmarek (emphasis mine)

Others have said it, but if this is the attitude you're going to take to combating crime then why not just give everyone a 9pm curfew and be done with it? Why not just lock us all up, because at least that way we can only do harm to ourselves, right? Crime levels will plummet!

Of course the main reason, as if it isn't obvious, that you shouldn't be doing this in Redruth, or even nationally, is that it is completely and utterly illiberal. It doesn't matter to me even if you could prove that curfews work because there is absolutely no price that I think we should be willing to pay for reduction in crime and increased safety if it has to be bought with our freedoms. For the Liberal Democrats to come across in support of this especially makes me think that truly the political masses have absolutely lost the plot in all three corners completely.

I just also want to give heads up to other bloggers, DK, Womble on tour, Jock Coats, Liberal England and Don't Trip Up all have very sensible things to say

Finally, going back to that Times report on over three quarters of people agreeing to curfews, one has to ask exactly what the respondents were thinking when answering that. Were they looking self-loathingly in the mirror as they admitted that they were a bad parent and needed police aid to help them? Or was it more likely that perhaps they were thinking that their children are little angels, but my god those shits from down the other end of town ought to be locked up let alone put under curfew? I guess we'll never know, but one thing I think would be interesting is to see just how popular it is when their kids are moaning and complaining indoors about having nothing to do.

In fact, on that line of thought, while it is easy for the public to decry perfectly reasonable measures on disuading knife crime because of "practicality issues" they think that this country is set up and resourced to have police patrolling every town, city and village for kids hanging out on street corners? My what an amazing power the ferocious red tops have over us when it comes to only being satisfied if we get blood with every solution.

Comments

Post a comment

"While we must not demonise all young people, we have to acknowledge that youngsters don’t have to commit crime or anti-social behaviour to be intimidating to residents. - Julia Goldsworthy"

Wow. That’s um... that’s... hmmm... Yeah, how do you respond to something so mind-meltingly moronic. I’m gonna have to sit on that for a while and come back.

2. Lee Griffin - 15 Jul 2008 - 14:42

It’s right up there in the annuls of amazingly bat shit insane statements as far as I’m concerned. Right along side the stuff the tinfoil hat brigade try to sell.

While not a resident of Redruth myself, I am from the local area. I find it distinctly un-liberal to simply "apply" a curfew. Furthermore, I do not recall myself or any of my friends ever being notified about the this new scheme, let alone being offered the opportunity, as a young member of the community, to voice my opinion. Cliché perhaps, but I feel Orwell only erred in his title. I feel genuinely disappointed by this one-punishment-fits-all solution.

It seems to me that the scheme will have a decidedly negative impact on both the police force and the community. Most prominently, the police will be wasting precious time they have on the streets arresting people for utilizing pavements--probably not high on the list of dangers to society. Secondly, I would find it hard to summon any kind of confidence in the authorities if I were to be arrested for being, in the enduring words of the Hitchhiker’s Guide, mostly harmless.

If I were living in an afflicted area I would be tempted to loiter with a vengeance on every spare night I had to show that my rights as a citizen do not end when 9 o’clock rolls around.

I do sincerely hope other youths in the community open their eyes to this matter and take notice.

4. Lee Griffin - 21 Jul 2008 - 08:00

Hey Brendan, thanks for your view. I think for the youths in the Redruth area the most important thing is to have some solidarity as you say. Expect those in curfew areas simply to move elsewhere in the town, I hope they do because if and when the police start trying to order kids from outside the original small area where there is supposedly a problem then they are visibly crossing the line in to punishment for all.

Whilst I don’t think this particularly fair to the kids in redruth, it is a step to seperate them from the mindless 19 etc year olds that are the people they look up to. I actually believe a curfew on the young adults would be more effective. It is the older youths that run their little gangs around this area and if keeping the younger ones away from them stops some of the mindless anarchy and beatings that go on round here then I think it’s worth it. Until you have been on the recieving end of this mindless violence you will not understand.
What about normal citizens human rights? Are we supposed to lie down and be kicked to death just because they’re kids? The police are never around in this town it’s ridiculous.

6. ker_know - 25 Jul 2008 - 00:07

Well well it seems we have arrived at a time when punishing people for there age is here. Fanciest rule for all! surely there is no difference between punishing someone for there age to say punishing someone for there religion or there sexuality.

According to the front page of the Western Morning News sixteen year olds are to be under curfew. What about all the 16 year olds that lead an almost completely adult life. 16 year olds in certain circumstances are able to marry, have children AND EVEN LIVE AWAY FROM HOME!woooo So mummy and daddy won’t be able to keep them in. Can you imagine a married 16 year old mother not being able to leave her home past 9p.m to buy milk and nappies for her baby?

I’m mean have the local authorities gone completely mad. Or is it the case they have decided ’ittle doo boy’! maybe they are going to be selective over who they will target. maybe only young males with certain clothes will be arrested. Heaven forbid the Devon and Cornwall police would discriminate!

7. Lee Griffin - 25 Jul 2008 - 10:22

"What about normal citizens human rights? Are we supposed to lie down and be kicked to death just because they’re kids? The police are never around in this town it’s ridiculous."

Thankfully I don’t believe many people are kicked to death nationally, let alone in Redruth. A little less sensationalism goes a long way really does it? Normal citizens have their human rights and it’s a complete fallacy to assume that because some kids are out and about that you suddenly can’t do everything you previously could.

If they’re causing a problem, call the police. If the police aren’t doing their job that is a POLICE RESOURCING ISSUE not one of kids being shits. If there aren’t enough police then asking for this curfew is ridiculous as it won’t be able to be adequately enforced without removing police from other areas where there is actually a higher likelihood of crime. But I suppose you’ll feel safer with the police concentrating on keeping all 16 year olds inside while he 18+ year olds beat each other up over kicking out time?

Ultimately you fall in to the very trap I talk about in this article, if the 19 year olds are the problem (and I understand where you’re coming from) then deal with the 19 year olds. Why persecute ALL young people because of something other people are doing or feeling? It’s a ridiculous way to make law.

When my son took Richmond Poiice and the Met Police to the high court 3 years ago (AS W from Richmond) we thought this nonsense had finally been stopped in its tracks. But it seems the police have found a way round the law by telling parents they have to voluntarily register to have their children taken home, with dire threats about what will happen if they refuse to comply. Big brother comes to Britain. All I can say is, I am glad I now live in Botswana!

9. Lee Griffin - 8 Aug 2008 - 14:38

Hey anon, thanks for your input. I too think it’s a shame, but I can’t blame the police as much as the politicians actually standing behind them as if it’s a good idea. My only hope is that the curfew will have done little in Redruth, but I’m sure it will be spun to success...indeed people were claiming it was a success before it even started!

Hope you’re enjoying Botswana smile

10. Eddie Osborne - 10 Sep 2008 - 16:17

Sadly for the knockers, who bang on about "human rights" when they don’t mean the rights of the residents who have been plagued by the noisy and uncontrolled few, the scheme worked! Crime down, anti-social behaviour down (News: you don’t have a "right" to keep people awake at night)and more parents actually connecting with their children. It shouldn’t be necessary to impose sensible bed-times for children but sadly in a few cases it is. The peace-loving vast majority have, for once, had their rights upheld.

11. Lee Griffin - 13 Sep 2008 - 15:59

Eddie: If we confined you and all of Redruth to their homes using security guards on every house, crime and anti-social behaviour would fall to 0% or there abouts. No doubt you advocate this as a solution as the only thing important to you is where the crime figures go?

Leave a comment



[b]Bold[/b] [i]Italic[/i] [u]Underline[/u] [del]Linethrough[/del] [q]Quote[/q]


smile wink wassat tongue laughing sad angry crying 

Please type the word "blogs" in here to validate.

Top 5:

Temporarily disabled to aid loading times

Hidden Treasures:

Temporarily disabled to aid loading times

Calendar:

« July 2008 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 

Best Blogs:

Temporarily disabled to aid loading times

Latest Politalks:

Temporarily disabled to aid loading times

Latest News:

Temporarily disabled to aid loading times

Great Links:

Temporarily disabled to aid loading times

Categories:

Bloggers (21)
ebuzz (1)
Post (284)
--Art (1)
--Bloggers under attack (1)
--Comedy (3)
----Satire (4)
------Politalks (10)
--Community (5)
--Countries (0)
----Australia (1)
----China (2)
----Counties/Towns (0)
------Bristol (3)
------Cornwall (2)
----Darfur (3)
----EU (12)
----Iraq (1)
----Israel (1)
----Italy (1)
----Middle East (5)
----Palestine (1)
----USA (18)
--Critical response (26)
--Culture (3)
--Deaths (6)
--Demographics (1)
----Children (16)
------Boys (0)
------Girls (0)
------Yobs (7)
----Disability (2)
----Farmers (3)
----Pensioners (1)
--Disgusting traits (6)
----Apathy (4)
----Authoritarianism (35)
----Avoiding questions (12)
----Boring (2)
----Censorship (1)
----Clandestine (15)
----Discrimination (17)
----Fearmongering (1)
----Flip flopping (6)
----Forced worship (2)
----Hidden agenda (13)
----Hypocrisy (18)
----Immaturity (3)
----Misrepresentation (8)
----Moronic (19)
----Neglect (6)
----NIMBYism (3)
----Over-reaction (7)
----Petulance (3)
----Positive action (2)
----Prejudice (13)
----Selfishness (16)
----Undermining (8)
----Vigilantism (5)
----Vile (5)
----Xenophobia (3)
--False Priorities (27)
--Film (2)
--Gaming (5)
--Internet (7)
----P2P (3)
--Language (2)
--Lists (2)
--Long time coming (7)
--Music (2)
--Oddball (8)
--Organisations (1)
----BBC (12)
----BBFC (1)
----Carnival on Modern Liberty (1)
----Charity (2)
----Compass (1)
----Councils (5)
------Bristol Council (4)
----Dentists (3)
----FSA (1)
----ITV (1)
----Liberal Conspiracy (31)
------Casting the net (29)
----MAMAA (1)
----Mary Whitehouse (2)
----Media (30)
------Daily Mail (0)
------Grieving Widows (1)
------Guardian (0)
------Telegraph (1)
------The Sun (0)
------Times (1)
----Media Watch UK (1)
----National Lottery (1)
----NHS (8)
----NIAAA (1)
----No2ID (1)
----Northern Rock (5)
----Police (14)
----Television (2)
------Big Brother (1)
----Transport (9)
------First Bus (1)
------Oyster cards (1)
------Trains (1)
----Women\'s Institute (1)
--Other traits (0)
----Best practice (6)
----Common sense (7)
----Cool (0)
----Fairness (4)
----Honesty (4)
--Politics (134)
----Crime issues (18)
------Child Abuse (3)
------Justice (3)
------Knives (5)
------Law (13)
--------Data Protection Act (4)
--------Libel (1)
--------RIPA (1)
------Prohibition (7)
------Sex Offenders (1)
----Economic issues (17)
------Benefits (9)
------Budget (3)
------Fuel Poverty (6)
------Housing (6)
------Inflation (4)
------Minimum Wage (2)
------Money (37)
------Nationalisation (3)
------Poverty Line (2)
------Privatisation (2)
------Rich/Poor divide (5)
------Salaries (6)
------Taxes (18)
--------Windfall tax (1)
------Unemployment (5)
----Education issues (18)
------Schools (10)
--------Exclusions (1)
--------National Curriculum (5)
--------Teachers (2)
--------Truancy (2)
------Students (3)
--------Student Loans (2)
------University (5)
----Elections (29)
------Electoral reform (7)
------US Primaries 2008 (0)
----Ethical issues (4)
------Abortion (3)
------Age restrictions (4)
------Animal cruelty (4)
------Animal testing (1)
------Capital punishment (2)
------Copyright (0)
------Corporate Profits (2)
------Curfews (1)
------Deportation (2)
------Detention without charge (18)
------DNA (3)
------Equality (1)
------Feminism (1)
------File sharing (1)
------Free Speech (1)
------ID Cards (8)
------Organ donation (4)
------Prostitution (3)
--------Brothels (1)
------Surveillance (7)
--------CCTV (1)
------Terrorism (11)
----Families (1)
------Polygamy (1)
----Foreign issues (2)
------Military (5)
------Trafficking (1)
------War (3)
--------Illegal Munitions (1)
--------Warcrimes (1)
----Global issues (4)
------Climate change (11)
------Environment (11)
--------Energy (1)
----------Renewables (1)
----Liberalism (3)
----Local issues (3)
----Parliament (23)
------Bills (6)
--------Changing clocks (3)
--------Coroners and Justice Bill (5)
------Debate (3)
------House of Lords (1)
------MPs (7)
--------Alan Johnson (1)
--------Alistair Darling (2)
--------Backtracking (1)
--------Bill Rammell (2)
--------Boris Johnson (1)
--------Caroline Flint (3)
--------Chris Grayling (1)
--------David Cameron (14)
--------David Davis (1)
--------David Lammy (1)
--------Derek Conway (2)
--------Frank Field (0)
--------George Osbourne (0)
--------Gordon Brown (32)
--------Harriet Harperson (1)
--------Hazel Blears (2)
--------Jack Straw (2)
--------Jacqui Smith (15)
--------Julia Goldsworthy (1)
--------Keith Vaz (2)
--------Lynne Featherstone (1)
--------Maggie Thatcher (1)
--------MP Expenses (3)
--------Nick Clegg (14)
--------Norman Baker (1)
--------Norman Lamb (1)
--------Tim Yeo (1)
--------Vince Cable (3)
------PMQs (14)
------Written Questions (1)
----Personal issues (5)
------Age (4)
------Health issues (10)
--------Alcohol (13)
--------Food (10)
----------Fast Food (1)
--------Medicine (0)
----------MMR Vaccine (0)
--------Obesity (1)
--------Smoking (1)
------Patriotism (1)
------Sex (5)
------Work-life balance (1)
----Political Parties (2)
------Coalition (0)
------Democrats (10)
------Labour (46)
------Lib Dem (31)
------Rebellion (1)
------Republicans (5)
------Tory (30)
----Political vernacular (0)
------Balanced and Sustainable (2)
------Change (4)
------Crisis (2)
------Gimmick (2)
------Propaganda (4)
------Targets (10)
------Waste (4)
----Race issues (3)
------Immigration (8)
----Scandal (4)
------Cash for Amendments (1)
------Political donations (3)
----Strikes (0)
----UK Constitution (1)
--Protests (14)
----G20 2009 (3)
--Public engagement (10)
----Polls (7)
----Referendum (2)
--Public figures (0)
----Barack Obama (14)
----Baroness Warsi (1)
----Celebrity (2)
----Chief Medical Officer (1)
----Heath Ledger (2)
----Hillary Clinton (11)
----Ian Tomlinson (2)
----John Edwards (3)
----John McCain (0)
----Sarah Palin (0)
--Religion (9)
----Christianity (2)
----God squad (7)
----Hinduism (0)
----Islam (1)
--Sport (3)
----Olympics 2008 (4)
----Olympics 2012 (2)
----Paralympics 2008 (1)
--Statistics (14)
--Worrying trends (13)
Reviews (13)
Share (53)